HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 227
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 588
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP180S2128G 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJRA0202 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 222
Write 148
Mixed 164
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 14.1
76% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 8.49
20% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-60U6AA0 500GB
420GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.8
Write 12.9
16% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 45%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
406GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 13
Mixed 11.8
17% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 49%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
403GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.54% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 13
Mixed 14.8
19% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.16
52% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 15%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250G 250GB
89GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 18
Write 13
Mixed 13
18% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.54
4K Write 3.43
4K Mixed 1.88
193% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback