bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3072 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 18:20
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 174
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 346
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 11D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.95
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 13.8
12% 13.9 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 15.8
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 13%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
30GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 89%
Citrix Virtual Disk 107GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 73.6
Write 44.5
Mixed 49.2
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.11
4K Write 5.58
4K Mixed 4.19
824% 5.29 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback