Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4158VKT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4158VKT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory44.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 149
56% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 505
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.56 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.01
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 418
Write 299
Mixed 169
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 8.59
4K Mixed 1.39
8% 3.69 MB/s
DQ Read 7.64
DQ Write 6.21
DQ Mixed 2.16
3% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 141%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 153
Write 81.3
Mixed 99.4
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 11.5
64% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 96.9
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 28.4
40% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36JDZS1G72PZ-1G4D 00C2 36JDZS1G72PZ-1G4D 00C2 36JDZS1G72PZ-1G4D 00EC M392B1K70CM0-YH9 00EC M392B1K70CM0-YH9 00EC M392B1K70CM0-YH9 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 21
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback