HP 700-406no

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-406no  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 18 '18 at 14:02
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 187
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 360
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Device(1B0A 90D2) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 35.1
25% 31.6 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 34.9
25% 29.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 166
Mixed 161
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.19
96% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
589GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 143
Mixed 155
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 115
Write 134
Mixed 94.5
148% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.33
62% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 88.9
Write 8.58
Mixed 23.1
36% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.22
4K Write 0.06
4K Mixed 0.55
55% 3.28 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 30%
Kingston DataTravelerMini 2GB
1GB free, PID 1605
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 7.3
Mixed 10
13% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
21% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback