bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 26 '18 at 13:21
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU #000, 8 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 39.2
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 70.3
29% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 621
40% 386 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 558GB
492GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 110
Write 99.5
Mixed 148
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 11.1
39% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 52.4
53% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 79%
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.5% Poor
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 148
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 12.6
41% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 44.2
49% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 55
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 125%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback