Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V GEN3  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 18:30
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 512
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 45.7
30% 36.2 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 32.5
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASX900S3-128GM 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 490
Write 128
Mixed 209
60% 276 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 11.9
101% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 11.1
24% 46 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 68%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
514GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 90.8
Mixed 84.6
68% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.23
98% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
196GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 79.6
Write 82.5
Mixed 73.4
59% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.43
111% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
37GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 58.1
Mixed 72.3
48% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.46
90% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
18GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 52.1
Mixed 50.6
43% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.29
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback