Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '16 at 07:53
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 109
58% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 340
32% 264 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 29.1
32% 32.5 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 34.7
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc SSD101 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 320ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 188
Write 87.1
Mixed 113
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 13
68% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 67.9
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 31.4
38% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
545GB free
Firmware: HP40 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 97.1
Mixed 96
75% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.47
112% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 17.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback