Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-V (all builds)
Memory	18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 06:21
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 526 54% 439 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 114 Parallax 113 90% 113 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 101 Splatting 82.5 75% 92.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 159GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2331 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 22 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 60 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2670015510	45.3% Average	Read 226 Write 181 Mixed 183 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 15.4 77% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 15.5 22% 40 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4238 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 51 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 60 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4206332217	53.5% Above average	Read 294 Write 296 Mixed 260 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 14.7 73% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 13.9 20% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 301GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 173 1941 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 21 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2313 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4160 (C2) HDA temperature 106 105 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	96.6% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 170 Mixed 152 122% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.34 136% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 60GB free Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 4944 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1260 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 48 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 418856171 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25582 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1256 (B4) Unknown 100 100 453137745 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 58 622460964 (C2) HDA temperature 36 42 30064771108 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 33 4944 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 48 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	50.8% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 86.9 Mixed 29.8 50% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.23 57% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 88%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 138 Write 25.5 Mixed 43.6 67% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.97 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.99 88% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. KHX1600C10D3/4G 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.6% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.5 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	223x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	149x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16