Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110217
Uptime	34.6 Days
Run Date	May 19 '18 at 17:20
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 84.7 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 93.2 49% 74.9 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 223 26% 203 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 51.7 33% 40.7 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 36.8 28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 72 14684947 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -51986284137210 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3816 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 63 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14684947 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14684947 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14684947 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12090 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12697 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12697 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14428	24.6% Poor	Read 153 Write 52.9 Mixed 59 19% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 6.24 48% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 49.9 DQ Mixed 5.53 12% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 478GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 209625762 (03) Spinup time 98 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7376 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 356234100 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24175 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 73 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4713 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 8590131567 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 900 (BE) vendor-specific 68 51 538181664 (C2) HDA temperature 32 49 30064771104 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 26 209625762 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -37434934928070 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1139105853 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4281884710	33.6% Below average	Read 55.2 Write 61.9 Mixed 73.3 48% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.31 65% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 50GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 171 2283 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5866 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 2 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4259 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1925 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 77 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5853 (C2) HDA temperature 113 103 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.8% Below average	Read 127 Write 11.7 Mixed 16.5 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.14 85% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.8% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 9.8 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353