bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit farver, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 30.8
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 141
42% 80 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 181
18% 147 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Asus(1043 3009) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 21.8
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 18.6
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
4GB ATA Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: AD B61FK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 15
Mixed 19.8
5% 22 MB/s
4K Read 6.35
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.09
10% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 91.2
Mixed 31
50% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.32
86% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
ST640LM0 00 HM641JI 640GB
7GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 21.1
Mixed 21.5
28% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.36
69% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback