Asus P8H61

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110913
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '18 at 18:35
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 193 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 369 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 3.66 4% 4.49 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 4.53 Splatting 3.22 4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1966 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 602 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5902747714	51.6% Above average	Read 233 Write 189 Mixed 190 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 20.8 95% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34.9 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 21.2 25% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 458GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 333 (03) Spinup time 178 174 6091 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4029 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 5 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7309 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2282 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 35872 (C2) HDA temperature 114 104 36 (C4) Reallocation count 195 195 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 198 198 670 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 198 198 597 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 194 159 (C8) Write error rate 197 197 608	37.4% Below average	Read 63.2 Write 67.5 Mixed 11.1 34% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.08 25% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 63%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 417GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 80 5411 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2299 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6823 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2297 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 176094183459 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 11 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2308	81.1% Excellent	Read 136 Write 146 Mixed 87.3 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.93 4K Mixed 0.58 146% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 8GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.4 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	41x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	40x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	19x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16