Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory29GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 29GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory14.3 GB free of 29 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMay 29 '18 at 14:10
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
None, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 142
56% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 408
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 140GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
Read 248
Write 265
Mixed 185
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 10.1
37% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 34.1
29% 41.1 MB/s
Virtual HD 38GB
26GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
Read 473
Write 372
Mixed 387
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 11.5
41% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 70.7
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 70.6
59% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 29GB
null MHz
3968, 25728 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback