MSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '18 at 18:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 66.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 862
78% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,222
76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 33.7
33% 33.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 35
Splatting 33.9
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 517
Write 326
Mixed 389
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 29.1
112% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 48.2
65% 118 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3GB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 114
Write 121
Mixed 112
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.41
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D2 CMK8GX4M 16GB
1200, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback