Today's hottest deals

Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '18 at 15:10
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 260
31% 238 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 60
53% 64.6 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 64.5
54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 295
Write 102
Mixed 139
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 10.7
73% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 11.6
26% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
106GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 91.2
Write 73.2
Mixed 30.1
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.33
85% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 69%
Asmt 2135 1TB
85GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 28.3
Mixed 29.4
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback