Dell Studio 1558

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 58% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Studio 1558  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0874P6
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '18 at 22:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 38.2
33% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 64.2
8-Core 96.4
10% 80.3 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Dell(1028 0413) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 240GB-$170
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 181
Write 113
Mixed 138
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 4.9
31% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 9.85
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 5.11
6% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273BH1-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio 1558 Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1558

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback