Asus P7H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '18 at 11:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 156
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 363
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 40.7
39% 44.5 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 187
Write 89.9
Mixed 196
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 2
39% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 5.69
11% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 91%
OCZ-TRION100 1TB
820GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 79.6
Write 80.6
Mixed 74.2
59% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.16
47% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback