TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '14 at 15:37
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 123
41% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 421
39% 326 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gainward(10B0 0FC6) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4475
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.4
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 9.37
Splatting 13
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 8.85%
 Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
490GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 12.1
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 76.4%
 Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
38GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 31.7
Mixed 8.2
28% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.19
18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 12.5%
 Great: 44%
Ut163 USB2FlashStorage 2GB
2GB free, PID 0163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 5.08
Mixed 2.44
10% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.26
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
25% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.48%
 Great: 6%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples227x
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples102x
FX-8320AMD  $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples95x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples30x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples27x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples21x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples18x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX  $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback