Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 22:44
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$325
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1201
106% 900 Pts
64-Core 2,008
124% 2,008 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 3120 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 218
Parallax 212
167% 212 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 200
Splatting 135
128% 158 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 143%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
869GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
507% Outstanding
Read 4,826
Write 3,844
Mixed 3,318
887% 3,996 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 44.1
230% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.2
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 255
200% 262 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 507%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
869GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
512% Outstanding
Read 4,811
Write 3,433
Mixed 3,684
882% 3,976 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 80
278% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 256
264% 433 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 512%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
509GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
531% Outstanding
Read 4,825
Write 3,756
Mixed 3,767
915% 4,116 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 79
276% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 259
266% 436 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 531%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
509GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
511% Outstanding
Read 4,785
Write 3,478
Mixed 3,214
848% 3,826 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 78.9
272% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 259
266% 435 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 511%
Great: 353%
OCZ Vector 150 480GB-$389
436GB free
Firmware: 1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 500
Mixed 504
113% 507 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 35.9
154% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 95.8
143% 269 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 850
Mixed 1,269
294% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 68
230% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 32.8
143% 322 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 220%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 69
MC Mixed 36.4
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 11.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $679
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback