Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 05:50
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 192
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 493
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 136 174 183 183 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 187
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 166
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
142GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Read 9
Write 11.2
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 11.9
8% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 32%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
311GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 24.8
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 3.1
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 41%
WDC WD32 00AAKS-75SBA0 320GB
70GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 24.2
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
74GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 41
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 41.9
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
29GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 12 14 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Read 18
Write 2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 13.4
11% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback