Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 22:46
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 704
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 33.3
32% 33.1 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 33.3
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SSD 480GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UC17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 85 4.3 3.8 64 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 429
Write 338
Mixed 235
SusWrite 35.9
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 1.9
50% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 3.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
16% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 184 193 176 178 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 99.6
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 182
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
335GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 102 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44% Average
Read 137
Write 102
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 102
112% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44%
Great: 52%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
910GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 74
Write 100
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 79.6
105% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
181% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FDD2 CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback