Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 10:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 776
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 775
48% 775 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.6
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 30.7
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RevuAhn_850X2M128GB 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1114B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 353 364 363 363 364 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 362
Mixed 318
SusWrite 361
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 45.1
152% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 189
167% 250 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
46GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 76 75 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41% Average
Read 66.5
Write 64.3
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 75.9
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 29.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 101%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback