Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '18 at 00:07
Run Duration	470 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 61 2-Core 129 58% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 292 31% 250 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 213 213 213 213 201 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.7% Above average	Read 187 Write 215 Mixed 178 SusWrite 211 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 31.7 106% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 72.2 DQ Mixed 35.8 31% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 107%
Seagate USBFlash 64GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 13 14 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Read 28.8 Write 15 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 13.1 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 69.6 57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16