Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '18 at 03:37
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 518
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.8
29% 30.9 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 32
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 197 199 192 188 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 255
Write 219
Mixed 173
SusWrite 193
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 25.8
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 113
105% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 91%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 116
Mixed 70.3
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
7GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 89 79 89 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 87.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 86.5
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 83%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
3GB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 66.3
70% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
5GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 35 32 34 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 33.3
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback