Asrock H87M

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140501
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '22 at 09:47
Run Duration	421 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 172 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 562 54% 445 Pts	64-Core 561 35% 561 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.09 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.5% Above average	Lighting 71.1 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 69.2 58% 71.7 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 68.5 56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ1A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 29 144 35 35 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 419 Write 145 Mixed 337 SusWrite 79.2 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 28.7 97% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 143 95% 116 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 85%
Kingston SA400S37120G 240GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 105GB free Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 50 44 49 47 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 452 Write 282 Mixed 289 SusWrite 76 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 20.8 84% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 57.1 DQ Mixed 108 89% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 87%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 26GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 54 53 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 54.5 Mixed 42 SusWrite 52.2 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 51%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 116GB free Firmware: SD35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 50 52 49 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 100 Write 13.2 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 50.8 39% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$32 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 552GB free Firmware: 0401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 101 103 100 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 112 Write 123 Mixed 68 SusWrite 102 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 55 59 57 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 105 Write 98.7 Mixed 76 SusWrite 56.7 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 189% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 544GB free Firmware: 0909 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 52 55 52 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 116 Write 89.5 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 52.8 62% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 384GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 28 30 28 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 80.5 Write 84.3 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 29.4 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 104%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB 4,641 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 385GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 98 93 96 93 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 64.2 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 92.1 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 63%
ST3000DM 003-2AE16L 3TB 225GB free, PID 6103 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 149 145 151 147 154 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.2% Good	Read 160 Write 117 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 146 160% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s

WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 17GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8 7.7 8.1 7.9 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 35.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 7.9 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 22%
HitachiG ST 2TB 424 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 537GB free, PID 1015 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 52 54 52 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 44 Write 48.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 52.5 61% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 51%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 37GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 46 40 46 48 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 77.2 Write 78.2 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 45.1 87% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 60%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 942GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.9 7.5 7.8 7.5 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 39 Write 34.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 7.8 36% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 18%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 30GB free, PID b049 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 20 20 19 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 90.2 Write 15.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 19.6 39% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.5 248% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 49%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 107GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.8 7 7.4 6.9 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 14.3 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 7.3 21% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 41%
WD Elements 1078 2TB 2,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 46GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 55 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	23% Poor	Read 46 Write 45.7 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 57.5 63% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-084.A01LF 0467 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 12GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.4 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	28x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	9x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	9x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
730 Series 240GBIntel $250Bench 84%, 8,417 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16