bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130730
Uptime113.9 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 13:54
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.4% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 137
55% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 298
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.9 12 11 11 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 82.5
Write 63.8
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 10.8
43% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
600% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 91%
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
22GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.8 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 77
Write 65.5
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 10.7
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
245% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 103%
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.8 12 11 11 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 85
Write 59.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 10.8
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 5.5
950% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 91%
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.9 12 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 68
Write 54.3
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 10.8
40% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 5.1
852% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 103%
Vmware Virtual disk 428GB
396GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 37 36 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 58
Write 55
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 35.3
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 5.9
782% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 32%
Vmware Virtual disk 88GB
75GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.6 8.5 10 12 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
Read 104
Write 28
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 10.5
38% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.2
601% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
Vmware Virtual disk 90GB
77GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.6 8 10 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16% Very poor
Read 43.3
Write 59.8
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 9.5
34% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3
629% 4.07 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 92GB
79GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.2 10 10 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 55
Write 61.3
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 9.7
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 5.5
974% 5.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback