Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 07 '16 at 07:38
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335 868 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 651 62% 511 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 3.31 6% 8.05 fps	MRender 15.1 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 12.1 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
C400-MTFDDAC256M 256GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0D09 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16700 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 943 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 27 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 10522742687035 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 87 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 35 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	65.1% Good	Read 448 Write 261 Mixed 334 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 7.71 79% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 8.24 60% 137 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 65%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 270GB free Firmware: 5G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 233 231 3308 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 977 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16712 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 940 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 870 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 106 (C2) HDA temperature 117 107 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	77.9% Very good	Read 145 Write 126 Mixed 131 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.63 163% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 79%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 121GB free Firmware: 5G04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 233 231 3316 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1913 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22996 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1070 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 860 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1052 (C2) HDA temperature 116 106 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.4% Good	Read 113 Write 103 Mixed 104 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.93 4K Mixed 0.54 141% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 4x4GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 34.9 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16