Acer Aspire 7736

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 7736  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JV50
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100201
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 20:01
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 61
36% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 58
8-Core 58.3
8% 58.2 Pts
64-Core 57.2
4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 0296) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.28
4% 5.19 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 5.26
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 211 211 188 124 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 252
Write 232
Mixed 219
SusWrite 167
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 33
99% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 151
117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59%
Great: 124%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
38GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 21.1
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 17.5
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 49%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
99GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Read 32.1
Write 17.2
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 0.1
17% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 48%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA600 6TB
366GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0 2.3 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 16
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 3.1
21% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 80%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
629GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 30.1
Write 8.7
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 2.5
15% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6%
Great: 41%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
76GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 16.1
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 19.9
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 7736 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 7736

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback