Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 09:08
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 661
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB; GeForce® GTX 1070 G1 Gaming 8G (rev. 2.0)
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 109
Parallax 107
82% 106 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 98.3
79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 615 315 316 297 288 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,801
Write 1,235
Mixed 496
SusWrite 356
214% 972 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 48
167% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 540
409% 554 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 170%
Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
25GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 468
Mixed 366
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 47
148% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 349
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 127%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
408GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 463 472 428 432 289 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 450
Mixed 432
SusWrite 422
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 43.5
144% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 129%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
223GB free
Firmware: DC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 264 259 251 255 263 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 387
Write 274
Mixed 269
SusWrite 254
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 33.6
118% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 157
147% 228 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
522GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 122 119 121 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 120
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FADG BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FADG 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.9% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback