Acer Aspire X3900

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FIH57
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091223
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '16 at 22:54
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 122 55% 89.7 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 206 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 6.69 Parallax 5.06 5% 5.95 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.96 4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 62GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1370 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 948 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 46 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 179 (EB) Unknown 99 99 105 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11273495732	52% Above average	Read 192 Write 139 Mixed 150 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 30.7 97% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 88.5 DQ Mixed 73.8 68% 106 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3969 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1876 (B1) Unknown 95 95 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 49 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 181 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9886207560	37.3% Below average	Read 189 Write 133 Mixed 147 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 8.51 55% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 24 47% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 465GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 116 106 7166 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8341 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12771 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8318 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 332510 (C2) HDA temperature 98 89 49 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.7% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 100 Mixed 90.5 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.35 93% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-DI 2x4GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.8% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire X3900 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3900

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	41x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	13x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	15x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	5x
GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 6GBHitachiBench 31%, 138 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16