| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180511 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 29 '18 at 01:45 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.8%
Good
|
59% 94.8 Pts
|
34% 270 Pts
|
19% 308 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
16% 18.5 fps
|
16% 19.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 133 134 134 134 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
38% 170 MB/s
|
108% 39.2 MB/s
|
90% 127 MB/s
|
|
MB0500EAMZD 500GB
364GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 123 124 124 124 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
80% 110 MB/s
|
200% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.8%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
56% 71.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 307 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 121x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 63x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 46x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 37x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $75 |