Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3 159 User benchmarks, average bench 38% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 51.1 1-Core 34 2-Core 68 32% 51 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 136 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 7865) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3 2% 3.01 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M500IT_MTFDDAK060MBD 60GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 132 134 137 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 373 Write 136 Mixed 168 SusWrite 131 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 23.8 75% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 134 111% 162 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 Team--Elite-1333 4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 6.2 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	32x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	7x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 30%, 515 samples	6x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GBUnknownBench 36%, 304 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x

Value: 29% - Poor

Total price: $74

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16