Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 09:06
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 124
59% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 283
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 36.9
31% 35.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37.4
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 51 14 66 9.1 7.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.8% Poor
Read 188
Write 84
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 42.8
22% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 10.1
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 11.8
10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$33
12GB free
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 71.7
Write 71
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 70.9
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
655GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 88 91 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 89.7
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
111GB free
Firmware: P22OAB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 54 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 47.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 54.8
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-199.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-199.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback