MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 193
60% 112 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 382
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1305 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 97.2
59% 79.4 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 56
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 423 410 420 446 416 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 463
Mixed 354
SusWrite 418
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 41.8
146% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 256
223% 330 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
454GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 178 177 172 177 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 129
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 175
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
306GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 93 90 94 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.3
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 91.5
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%
WD Re 2TB-$35
785GB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 112 110 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 133
Write 123
Mixed 92
SusWrite 112
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 83%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Read 18
Write 12.9
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 7.8
16% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.3
116% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 16%
Generic- Compact Flash 32GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.5 7.8 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 18
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 8.1
20% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 1,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback