Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '19 at 03:42
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 682 61% 515 Pts	64-Core 886 55% 886 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.76% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 24.8 0% 17.2 fps	MRender 30 Gravity 29.2 Splatting 34.1 26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 8.76% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.3 2.5 4 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 21 Write 164 Mixed 256 SusWrite 3.8 26% 111 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 27.3 102% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.6 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 31 28% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 23GB free Firmware: Q1204B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.9% Very poor	Read 172 Write 168 Mixed 190 SusWrite 19.5 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 82%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 40GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 47.8 Write 51.8 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 20.3 28% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 55%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 10GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 55.3 Write 74.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 20.3 37% 49.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 280GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 93 Write 86.3 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 20.3 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 28GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 106 Write 96.3 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 20.6 53% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 84%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 71GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 50 Write 59 Mixed 40 SusWrite 20.3 31% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.9 2 2 2.5 2.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Read 4 Write 2 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 2.1 3% 2.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 8%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 604GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 108 Write 99.8 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 78.6 110% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 41%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 85 84 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 110 Write 100 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 84.5 118% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 0.8 374% 3.93 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 0.6 416% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300V 3TB 76GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.8 9.9 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.2% Poor	Read 118 Write 124 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 9.8 88% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 1.03 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLGF65F-D8KMB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A F3-12800CL9-4 Corsair CMV4GX3M1A160 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 28.5 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	109x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	43x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	38x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	257x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	92x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16