Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210712
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '21 at 11:44
Run Duration	523 Seconds
Run User	BRN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 90.7 1-Core 158 2-Core 300 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 859 88% 708 Pts	64-Core 1,048 65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 38.4 30% 39.2 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 27.6 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 755GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 440 443 447 448 403 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 437 Mixed 422 SusWrite 427 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 43.2 152% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 251 192% 268 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 137%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 773GB free Firmware: 1AN10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 79 78 76 76 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 71 Write 77.7 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 76.1 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 519GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 94 93 94 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 80.5 Write 36.3 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 91.7 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 607GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 26 36 35 42 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 3.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 27.8 13% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 419GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 63 63 63 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 91.6 Write 40.3 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 61.4 77% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 492GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.4 6.1 5.6 6 5.2 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 123 Write 118 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 5.6 97% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 53%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 393GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0 0.1 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 71.2 Write 73.8 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 0.2 62% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 592GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 62 60 64 59 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 131 Write 140 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 60.3 126% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 703GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.1 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	24% Poor	Read 107 Write 110 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 2.2 86% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 47%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 336GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 63 60 23 2 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 119 Write 112 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 44.6 107% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 41%
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 608GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 94 92 89 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 87.5 Write 29.5 Mixed 36.1 SusWrite 88.5 76% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 566GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 75 76 74 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 127 Write 133 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 71.8 127% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 121% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 51%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 924GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0 0 3.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 137 Write 112 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 0.6 96% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 398GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 97 95 93 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 139 Write 44.8 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 91.4 101% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 121% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 927GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.1 44 58 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 124 Write 117 Mixed 68 SusWrite 18.5 102% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 53%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 831GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 75 76 74 71 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 43.5 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 72.1 84% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 47%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 589GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 64 64 64 59 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	38% Below average	Read 125 Write 118 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 62 114% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 18,139 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 36.3 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 29.1 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 37.7 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	31.5"	1280 720	GSM774F LG HDR 4K

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $154

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,466x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	3,161x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $246Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,536x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,291x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	999x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	957x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	787x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	728x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	661x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	616x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	435x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	401x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16