Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120321
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '20 at 03:27
Run Duration	338 Seconds
Run User	BRN-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 158 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 260 39% 284 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 36.2 29% 37.2 fps	MRender 35.9 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 26.3 26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 609GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 95 100 101 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 365 Write 247 Mixed 299 SusWrite 98.5 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 38.8 120% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 43.9 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 60.1 51% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 133%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 398GB free Firmware: 1AN10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 38 39 38 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 84.4 Write 114 Mixed 31 SusWrite 39.6 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 594GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 93 98 86 91 100 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 24.9 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 95.1 49% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 101 102 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 111 Write 113 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 101 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 211GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 99 107 94 98 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 107 Write 42.9 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 103 59% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 115GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 32.5 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 0.8 29% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 52 53 53 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 123 Write 117 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 51.8 104% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 261GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 104 Write 101 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 0.1 81% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 47%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 606GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 119 Write 38 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 27 71% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 504GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 52 52 52 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 51.3 110% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 841GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 28 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 115 Write 108 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 27.2 98% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 41%
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 129GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 2 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 92.9 Write 29.6 Mixed 44 SusWrite 1.5 46% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 38%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 365GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 109 Write 117 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 27.8 99% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 47%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 867GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0 2.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 127 Write 101 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 0.4 89% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 650GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 2.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 114 Write 41.4 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 0.8 59% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 401GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 2.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 121 Write 121 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 0.6 92% 75 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 463GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 111 Write 104 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 27.6 87% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	33x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	25x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	38x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $307

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16