Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110729
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '19 at 01:03
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 165 71% 117 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 420 45% 357 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% MSI(1462 2825) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.96 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.2% Below average	Lighting 44 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 24.3 36% 33.1 fps	MRender 55.4 Gravity 50.7 Splatting 0.09 25% 35.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 36%
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15 6,831 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0122) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.29% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 1.69 2% 2.68 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.37 Splatting 4.65 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.29% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 27 25 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.1% Poor	Read 114 Write 32.3 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 26.5 12% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 10.4 49% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.7 DQ Write 31.1 DQ Mixed 14.9 15% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 317GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 4.6 19 131 130 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 130 Write 130 Mixed 74.1 SusWrite 85.7 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL7-4GBXH F3-12800CL7-4GBXH 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.5% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

RAM
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 16,472 samples	14x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,087 samples	12x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $463

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16