Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '15 at 17:12
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150 8,564 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 57.9 2-Core 114 39% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 197 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 39% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 34.1 Parallax 44.8 29% 38.2 fps	MRender 30.1 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 40 29% 34.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8599327033 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28930899705861 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 20 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 14 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 34 90196541471 (C2) HDA temperature 31 34 90196541471 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8599327033 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 8599327033 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 8599327033 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26 (EA) Unknown 0 0 41 (F1) Unknown 0 0 41 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13	55.7% Above average	Read 481 Write 128 Mixed 208 59% 273 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 15.7 83% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 82.2 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 33.2 42% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 73%
Samsung S2 Portable 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 254GB free Firmware: MCCI Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 88 3586 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7932 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1250 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 93 93 7677 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1372 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 92 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 62 219044315169 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 12 (DF) Load/unload retry count 93 93 7677 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 63491	26.2% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 45.9 Mixed 45.7 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 26%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 246GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 136 4091 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 761 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7580 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 738 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 289 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 471 (C2) HDA temperature 110 92 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.8% Above average	Read 113 Write 91.9 Mixed 101 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.43 106% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 61GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 884 (03) Spinup time 132 127 4375 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2660 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 18192 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1793 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 439 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2660 (C2) HDA temperature 110 92 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.4% Average	Read 83.2 Write 85.4 Mixed 90.3 65% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.42 98% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	381x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)