| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121016 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '19 at 18:01 |
| Run Duration | 218 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
78% 134 Pts
|
53% 394 Pts
|
23% 374 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 344.16
|
53.4%
Above average
|
54% 68.4 fps
|
51% 63.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
202GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 218 218 217 218 218 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
46% 206 MB/s
|
98% 33 MB/s
|
31% 45.3 MB/s
|
|
|
13% 17.7 MB/s
|
28% 0.13 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
60.6%
Good
|
60% 21.1 GB/s
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
64% 62.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |