Lenovo 80E3

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80E3 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lancer 5B2
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140420
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '16 at 21:11
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 38.6 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 29 20% 27.5 Pts	4-Core 46.1 8-Core 48.9 6% 47.5 Pts	64-Core 51.1 3% 51.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2201.0 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.56 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 3.65 2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$124 11,742 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1225G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 113 (A3) Unknown 100 100 52 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1454 (A5) Unknown 100 100 8 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 201 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4377 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2517 (F5) Unknown 100 100 5816	49.3% Average	Read 462 Write 355 Mixed 426 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 11.5 24% 9.37 MB/s	DQ Read 16.8 DQ Write 27.1 DQ Mixed 0.3 6% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 F3-1600C11-8GSL 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 209 19% 209 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80E3 Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	205x
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 3,779 samples	102x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	92x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	202x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	102x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	54x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	25x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16