Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 08:41
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 140
59% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 381
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 1B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 78
50% 64.7 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 70
49% 58.9 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 379
Mixed 306
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 26.4
94% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 241
188% 260 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
416GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 364 364 369 370 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 403
Write 366
Mixed 319
SusWrite 365
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 35.6
121% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 251
189% 254 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
263GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 77 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 73
Write 74.2
Mixed 66
SusWrite 76.9
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
44GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 152 160 149 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 168
Mixed 106
SusWrite 155
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback