Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140522
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '19 at 23:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$45 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 72 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 153 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 401 38% 312 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 361B) 3GB CLim: 1309 MHz, MLim: 1614 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.5% Poor	Lighting 24.8 Reflection 43.2 Parallax 28.9 20% 32.3 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 51 Splatting 29.5 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 128 126 111 137 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Read 273 Write 165 Mixed 194 SusWrite 126 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 29.9 104% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 144 113% 154 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 888GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 72 Write 69.3 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 95.4 53% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CML8GX3M2A2133C11 0420 F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 0420 F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.7% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 9.8 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	375x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	255x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	192x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	127x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	121x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	91x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	46x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16