Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 09:30
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 73
2-Core 145
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 424
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294
Gigabyte(1458 37D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 115
Parallax 118
99% 118 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 83.9
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 333 397 378 368 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 479
Write 398
Mixed 278
SusWrite 354
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 30
110% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 58.5
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 180
113% 124 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 133%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
353GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 55
Write 44
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 55.6
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
745GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 44 44 45 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 75.8
Write 65.3
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 43.5
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
327GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 118 118 115 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 72
SusWrite 116
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 109%
ST500LT0 12-9WS142 500GB
440GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 29
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 10.7
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 40%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 178 178 168 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 158
Write 117
Mixed 111
SusWrite 174
188% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ F3-14900CL9-4 KHX1600C10D3/ F3-14900CL9-4 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback