Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA730
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 19:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 782
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 3001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4187
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 141
Parallax 130
109% 135 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 115
Splatting 102
100% 126 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 173 159 148 156 790 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,436
Write 241
Mixed 134
SusWrite 253
111% 516 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 45.8
173% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 15.7
124% 318 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 147%
Great: 228%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22ZAT0 500GB
83GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 28 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 40.3
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 30.1
47% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
625GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 97.3
Write 98.2
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 100
110% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019) Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback