Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '16 at 21:57
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 91 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 106 54% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 279 29% 234 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.5% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 36.1 Parallax 46.1 32% 40.3 fps	MRender 49.5 Gravity 34.5 Splatting 33.5 31% 39.2 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 156GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 521 Write 131 Mixed 155 58% 269 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 7.91 51% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 3.47 53% 130 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 72%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB 4,861 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 56GB free Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -45930380250900 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1054 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 138 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1920 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2176 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2176 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7424	34.6% Below average	Read 186 Write 66.3 Mixed 100 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 11.2 66% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 73.6 DQ Mixed 31.8 39% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 51%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 160GB 1,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 149GB free Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 262144 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 12894273702 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 701 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 658 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 694 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 706 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 706 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 240518758432 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1	40.2% Average	Read 73.2 Write 66.7 Mixed 66.7 52% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.35 96% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB 1,861 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 59GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 15.1 Mixed 17.1 23% 19 MB/s	4K Read 4.03 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.74 78% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 9,885 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.2% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $489

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16