PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20161118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 04 '20 at 19:58 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
5.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 18 23 23 23 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
38GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 30 29 30 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
107GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 27 28 27 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |