Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 389
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1305 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 32.4
22% 29.8 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 34
23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 432 428 440 441 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 357
Write 432
Mixed 331
SusWrite 420
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 47
154% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 295
239% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 75 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 67.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 73.8
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 87%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
89GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 60
Write 66
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 62.9
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 54%
Amcc 9650SE-4LPML 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
Read 173
Write 3.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.6
34% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 20 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 86.8
Write 42.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 17.3
60% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
81% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 28%
HGST HUS 726T6TALE6L4 6TB
3TB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 190 192 200 197 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 189
Mixed 119
SusWrite 189
235% 178 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.5
380% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 5
DQ Mixed 2
242% 2.67 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback