Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 23:47
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 128
56% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 294
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 55.4
37% 47.7 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 39.6
40% 50.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 178 206 208 222 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 441
Write 412
Mixed 315
SusWrite 226
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 43.9
145% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 257
189% 247 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 187 190 189 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 144
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 188
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 1TB
119GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 27
32% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback