Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 20:43
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 220
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 529
58% 458 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gainward(10B0 1401) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 352.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 43
37% 44.3 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.3
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 194 237 234 260 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 478
Write 326
Mixed 330
SusWrite 242
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 26.4
91% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 33.6
36% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
197GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 92 106 104 107 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 102
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
754GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 74 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 163
Write 80.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 73.8
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 8502 2000EL Series 029E CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 8502 2000EL Series 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.3% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 49.1
81% 49.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback