Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 146 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 202 26% 199 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0572) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 5.23 Parallax 2.75 3% 3.98 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.43 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401120RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 412 437 443 447 445 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 332 Write 320 Mixed 289 SusWrite 432 78% 343 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 30.1 87% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 235 210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88G1NS-DI Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 17.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	442x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 6%, 367 samples	18x
Radeon HD 7730MAMDBench 4%, 191 samples	8x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	64x
SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 2x4GBSmartBench 50%, 805 samples	41x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	33x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16